Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/14885
Registro completo de Metadatos
Campo DCValoridioma
dc.contributor.authorPalomo López, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorLosa Iglesias, Marta Elena-
dc.contributor.authorBecerro de Bengoa Vallejo, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Sanz, David-
dc.contributor.authorSan Antolín Gil, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorMartiniano, João-
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Lobo, César-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T12:16:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-01T12:16:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10662/14885-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to adapt the Spanish version of the Assessment of Stress in Nursing Students (ASNS) (shorter form) instrument for Spanish podiatry students, labeling the new tool as the Spanish version of Assessment of Stress in Podiatry Students (ASPS). The adaptation for reliability and repeatability included performing the transcultural adaptation process and examining the repeatability and reliability of ASPS when used in a different language. Methods: An internationally recommended translation procedure was used to adapt transculturally this tool. The instrument’s test–retest reliability was evaluated in two sessions that were 10 days apart. Results: After considering each domain’s total score, the reliability and internal consistency were analyzed with Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. Good internal consistency was reported according to total score (α = 0.8626) and each one of the six domains: (1) the practical activities performance domain showed a Cronbach’s α of 0.8684; (2) professional communication domain, α = 0.8765; (3) time management domain, α = 0.8832; (4) environment domain, α = 0.8974; (5) professional education domain, α =0.873; and (6) theoretical activity domain, α = 0.8787. Test–retest reliability, by paired test of Wilcoxon, was not significant, showing that there were not differences between domain scores (p ≥ 0.05). Lastly, visual distributions of Bland and Altman plots did not provide differences between domains and total scores. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the ASPS showed good repeatability, reliability and acceptability to measure stress parameters for podiatry students.es_ES
dc.format.extent15 p.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectStudentses_ES
dc.subjectReliability studieses_ES
dc.subjectPsychometricses_ES
dc.subjectPodiatryes_ES
dc.subjectEstudianteses_ES
dc.subjectEstudios de confiabilidades_ES
dc.subjectPsicometríaes_ES
dc.subjectPodologíaes_ES
dc.titleReliability and repeatability of the assessment of stress in nursing students instrument in podiatry students: A transcultural adaptationes_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
dc.description.versionpeerReviewedes_ES
europeana.typeTEXTen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco5701.12 Traducciónes_ES
dc.subject.unesco6105.05 Psicometríaes_ES
dc.subject.unesco3201.99 Otras (Podología)es_ES
dc.subject.unesco5801.06 Evaluación de Alumnoses_ES
europeana.dataProviderUniversidad de Extremadura. Españaes_ES
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPalomo-López P, Losa-Iglesias ME, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, López-López D, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Ántolín-Gil MS, Martiniano J, Calvo-Lobo C. Reliability and Repeatability of the Assessment of Stress in Nursing Students Instrument in Podiatry Students: A Transcultural Adaptation. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(11):3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113815es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Rey Juan Carloses_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Extremadura. Departamento de Enfermeríaes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Complutense de Madrid-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade da Coruña-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Europea de Madrid-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Lisboa. Portugal-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/11/3815es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app10113815-
dc.identifier.publicationtitleApplied Scienceses_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue11es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage3815-1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage3815-15es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume10es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn2076-3417-
Colección:DENFE - Artículos

Archivos
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
app10113815.pdf1,29 MBAdobe PDFDescargar


Este elemento está sujeto a una licencia Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons