Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/20100
Title: Benefits of equine-assisted therapies in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
Authors: Lavín Pérez, Ana Myriam
Collado Mateo, Daniel
Caña Pino, Alejandro
Villafaina Domínguez, Santos
Parraca, Jose Alberto
Apolo Arenas, María Dolores
Keywords: Esclerosis múltiple;Terapias asistidas con caballos;Equinoterapia;Multiple sclerosis;equine-assisted therapies;Equinotherapy
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Hindawi
Abstract: This systematic review aimed to provide an up-to-date analysis of the effects of equine-assisted therapies (EAT) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. PubMed and Web of Science databases were employed in the search, which ended in February 2022. The risk of bias analysis was performed using the Evidence Project tool. After removing duplicates, thirty-nine studies were identified. However, only ten fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Therefore, a total of 195 PwMS, aged between 40.3 and 51.3, were included in this systematic review. EAT-based interventions had a mean length of 13.6 weeks with a session´s frequency ranging from ten to once a week. All sessions involved real horses and lasted a mean of 34.4 min. Among the included articles, four were randomized controlled trials (RCT), four did not perform randomization, and two employed a prepost design without a control group. RCTs showed positive effects on quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed. Furthermore, non-RCT showed improvements in balance, spasticity, and postural control (postural control was not assessed in RCT studies). Importantly, significant effects were only observed when the comparison group was inactive or followed usual care. Therefore, EAT is a promising and effective therapy to improve quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed in PwMS. However, since comparison groups are heterogeneous, results could vary depending on the research design. Moreover, the inclusion of noncontrolled studies (in order to have a wide perspective of the state of art) could increase the risk of bias and make the results be taken with caution.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/20100
ISSN: 1741-427X
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9656503
Appears in Collections:DTMQU - Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2022_9656503.pdf548,29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons