Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A comparison of hole-filling methods in 3D
Authors: Pérez Hernández, Emiliano
Salamanca Miño, Santiago
Merchán García, María Pilar
Adán Oliver, Antonio
Keywords: Encuesta;Modelos poligonales 3D;Reparación de mallas;Llenado de huecos;Algoritmos de restauración;Survey;3D polygonal models;Hole-filling;Restoration algorithms
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: De Gruyter Open
Abstract: This paper presents a review of the most relevant current techniques that deal with hole-filling in 3D models. Contrary to earlier reports, which approach mesh repairing in a sparse and global manner, the objective of this review is twofold. First, a specific and comprehensive review of hole-filling techniques (as a relevant part in the field of mesh repairing) is carried out. We present a brief summary of each technique with attention paid to its algorithmic essence, main contributions and limitations. Second, a solid comparison between 34 methods is established. To do this, we define 19 possible meaningful features and properties that can be found in a generic hole-filling process. Then, we use these features to assess the virtues and deficiencies of the method and to build comparative tables. The purpose of this review is to make a comparative hole-filling state-of-the-art available to researchers, showing pros and cons in a common framework.
ISSN: 2083-8492
DOI: 10.1515/amcs-2016-0063
Appears in Collections:DIEEA - Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
amcs_2016_0063.pdf1,74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons