Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/19371
Registro completo de Metadatos
Campo DCValoridioma
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Jin Su-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Gómez, David-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T08:50:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-29T08:50:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10662/19371-
dc.descriptionThis article is part of the Research Topic Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral and Multidimensional Domain Research in STEM Education: Active Approaches and Methods towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-
dc.description.abstractDue to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, university education has faced a significant challenge that requires adaptation to virtual and online education. Here, a fruitful flipped methodology with increased popularity can support adaption to and improvement of the current pandemic situation. This research presents a comparison of two different instruction situations with an identical teaching methodology, face-to-face (F2F) and face-to-screen (F2S) flipped methodology, in terms of students' performance and affective domain in a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) course. It was considered and designed as an examination of 132 pre-service teachers (PSTs), with 68 and 64 PSTs respectively for each group. The first group before the pandemic was applied by F2F flipped classroom and the second group after the pandemic was applied by F2S flipped classroom. The results after pertaining various data analyses of class activities and questionaries showed that performance had been improved for both groups toward the course. In addition, F2F had a significant difference in PSTs' emotion and perception toward the course and made classes more interactive. The mean score values of students' emotion and perception between two groups showed that the difference between these mean values were significant, suggesting a very large effect. Particularly, the effect size (ES) showed that positive emotions were more significant with different variables and the items Q7–Q9 of questionnaires indicated more significant different perceptions for both F2F and F2S after completing the course. Finally, the principal component analysis (PCA) test described that F2F answers were located mainly in the positive emotion, while F2S answers were grouped in the negative emotion, while no differences were observed for PSTs perceptions to the flipped methodology. Consequently, although F2F–F2S transition was an effective process, instructors and PSTs faced difficulties in the platform usage for online lectures reflecting emotions' results in F2S group. Thus, by solving the problems raised, it will allow PSTs to be more interactive in a virtual and online context for their future implementation by giving them active instruction methodology and educating future students to teach STEM contents.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Consejerería de Economía e Infraestructura de la Junta de Extremadura y FEDER funds (Projects IB18004), whose support made this research possible.es_ES
dc.format.extent13 p.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSTEM educationes_ES
dc.subjectflipped classroomes_ES
dc.subjecte-learninges_ES
dc.subjectemotion and perceptiones_ES
dc.subjectEducación STEM-
dc.subjectAula invertida-
dc.subjectAprendizaje en línea-
dc.subjectEmoción y percepción-
dc.subjectCovid-19-
dc.subjectF2F and F2S-
dc.subjectF2F y F2s-
dc.subjectPerformance-
dc.subjectRendimiento-
dc.titleA STEM Course Analysis During COVID-19: A Comparison Study in Performance and Affective Domain of PSTs Between F2F and F2S Flipped Classroomes_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
dc.description.versionpeerReviewedes_ES
europeana.typeTEXTen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco1209.03 Análisis de Datoses_ES
dc.subject.unesco5801.05 Pedagogía Experimentales_ES
dc.subject.unesco5803.02 Preparación de Profesores-
europeana.dataProviderUniversidad de Extremadura. Españaes_ES
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJeong JS and González-Gómez D (2021) A STEM Course Analysis During COVID-19: A Comparison Study in Performance and Affective Domain of PSTs Between F2F and F2S Flipped Classroom. Front. Psychol. 12:669855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669855es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Extremadura. Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Matemáticases_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669855/fulles_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669855-
dc.identifier.publicationtitleFrontiers in Psychologyes_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue12es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage669855-1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage669855-13es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3321-9290es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1370-0623es_ES
Colección:DDCEM - Artículos

Archivos
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
fpsyg_2021_669855.pdf980,45 kBAdobe PDFDescargar


Este elemento está sujeto a una licencia Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons