Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/21065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlvarado Valiente, Jaime-
dc.contributor.authorRomero Álvarez, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorMoguel Márquez, José Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Alonso, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorMurillo Rodríguez, Juan Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T11:16:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-19T11:16:45Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn0963-9314-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10662/21065-
dc.descriptionOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.es_ES
dc.description.abstractAfter decades of advances, mainly theoretical, in recent years quantum computing has begun to show its first practical applications. This new and revolutionary technology aims to enhance essential areas such as cybersecurity, financial services, or medicine. The growth of this technology has encouraged different research centers and big companies such as IBM, Amazon, and Google to dedicate considerable efforts to developing new technologies that bring quantum computing to the market. However, these technologies are not yet mature and create a significant vendor lock-in problem. Therefore, new tools are needed that facilitate access to this technology and that allow developers to increase the abstraction level at which they work. Given that the integration of quantum software should not be very different from that of classical services, we can take advantage of the knowledge acquired and use current techniques of service-oriented computing. In this work, we have carried out a technical comparison between different quantum computing service providers using a case study, by performing empirical tests based on the Travelling Salesman Problem. This study highlights the differences between the main providers. To address these differences and reduce the vendor lock-in effect, we propose an extension of the Quantum API Gateway to support the different providers and the casuistry that each one presents. This would allow programmers to deploy quantum code without vendor-specific knowledge of the major providers, which would facilitate access and simplify the development of quantum applications.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is part of the Grant PID2021-1240454OB-C31 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/50100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”. It is also supported by the QSALUD project (EXP 00135977 / MIG-20201059) in the lines of action of the Center for the Development of Industrial Technology (CDTI); by the project 0786_ CAP4ie_4_P (Interreg V-A España-Portugal 2021-2027); and by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation of the Spanish Government through the Quantum ENIA project call - Quantum Spain project, and by the European Union through the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan - NextGenerationEU within the framework of the Digital Spain 2025 Agenda.es_ES
dc.format.extent21 p.es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectComputación cuánticaes_ES
dc.subjectServicios cuánticoses_ES
dc.subjectProveedores cuánticoses_ES
dc.subjectPuerta de enlace API cuánticaes_ES
dc.subjectQuantum computinges_ES
dc.subjectQuantum serviceses_ES
dc.subjectQuantum providerses_ES
dc.subjectQuantum API Gatewayes_ES
dc.titleTechnological diversity of quantum computing providers: a comparative study and a proposal for API Gateway integrationes_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
dc.description.versionpeerReviewedes_ES
europeana.typeTEXTen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco1203.17 Informáticaes_ES
dc.subject.unesco3325 Tecnología de las Telecomunicacioneses_ES
europeana.dataProviderUniversidad de Extremadura. Españaes_ES
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAlvarado-Valiente, J., Romero-Álvarez, J., Moguel, E. et al. Technological diversity of quantum computing providers: a comparative study and a proposal for API Gateway integration. Software Qual J 32, 53–73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09633-5es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Extremadura. Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos y Telemáticoses_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://link.springer.com/journal/11219es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11219-023-09633-5-
dc.identifier.publicationtitleSoftware Quality Journales_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage53es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage73es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume32-
dc.identifier.e-issn1573-1367-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0140-7788es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3162-1446es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4096-1282es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6819-0299es_ES
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4961-4030es_ES
Appears in Collections:DISIT - Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s11219-023-09633-5.pdf1,65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons