Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10662/6883
Registro completo de Metadatos
Campo DCValoridioma
dc.contributor.authorBernalte Morgado, Elena María-
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Christopher W.-
dc.contributor.authorBrownson, Dale A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMosna, Morgane-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Graham C.-
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Craig E.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-19T11:20:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-19T11:20:03Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2079-6374-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10662/6883-
dc.description.abstractWe explore the fabrication, physicochemical characterisation (SEM, Raman, EDX and XPS) and electrochemical application of hand-drawn pencil electrodes (PDEs) upon an ultra-flexible polyester substrate; investigating the number of draws (used for their fabrication), the pencil grade utilised (HB to 9B) and the electrochemical properties of an array of batches (i.e, pencil boxes). Electrochemical characterisation of the PDEs, using different batches of HB grade pencils, is undertaken using several inner- and outer-sphere redox probes and is critically compared to screen-printed electrodes (SPEs). Proof-of-concept is demonstrated for the electrochemical sensing of dopamine and acetaminophen using PDEs, which are found to exhibit competitive limits of detection (3 σ) upon comparison to SPEs. Nonetheless, it is important to note that a clear lack of reproducibility was demonstrated when utilising these PDEs fabricated using the HB pencils from different batches. We also explore the suitability and feasibility of a pencil-drawn reference electrode compared to screen-printed alternatives, to see if one can draw the entire sensing platform. This article reports a critical assessment of these PDEs against that of its screen-printed competitors, questioning the overall feasibility of PDEs’ implementation as a sensing platform.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTrabajo finaciado por: Junta de Extremadura. Ayuda PO 14021, para Elena Bernalte Morgado Ramsay Memorial Fellowships Trust. Ayuda para Dale A. C. Brownson British Council Institutional Link. Beca 172726574es_ES
dc.format.extent20 p.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectElectrodos para dibujo a lápizes_ES
dc.subjectElectrodos para serigrafíaes_ES
dc.subjectSensoreses_ES
dc.subjectElectroquímicaes_ES
dc.subjectPencil-drawn electrodeses_ES
dc.subjectScreen-printed electrodeses_ES
dc.subjectSensorses_ES
dc.subjectElectrochemistryes_ES
dc.titlePencil it in: exploring the feasibility of hand-drawn pencil electrochemical sensors and their direct comparison to screen-printed electrodeses_ES
dc.typearticlees_ES
dc.description.versionpeerReviewedes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco2210.05 Electroquímicaes_ES
dc.subject.unesco6203.04 Dibujo, Grabadoes_ES
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBernalte Morgado, E.; Foster, C. W.; Brownson, D. A. C.; Mosna, M.; Smith, G. C. y Banks, C. E. (2016). Pencil it in: exploring the feasibility of hand-drawn pencil electrochemical sensors and their direct comparison to screen-printed electrodes. Biosensors, 6, 3, 45. ESSN 2079-6374es_ES
dc.type.versionpublishedVersiones_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationManchester Metropolitan University. UKes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Extremadura. Departamento de Química Analíticaes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Chester. UK-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/6/3/45es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bios6030045-
dc.identifier.publicationtitleBiosensorses_ES
dc.identifier.publicationissue3es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage20es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationvolume6, 45es_ES
Colección:DQUAN - Artículos

Archivos
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
bios6030045.pdf1,66 MBAdobe PDFDescargar


Este elemento está sujeto a una licencia Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons